[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Human vs. natural influences on the environment



jwas@ix.netcom.com(jw) wrote:
>In that case, by acting to control global industry, you
>are as likely to damage the climate as to improve it,

Very poor logic.  How could reducing the magnitude of
an influence lead to harm as a result of the action?
The implication is that the situation would have gone
to hell by itself and required action to save it,
which is completely unsupported.

You are posting to two newsgroups in the sci.* hierarchy,
sir.  Please raise your standards accordingly or prune
the newsgroups list.




References: