I have not seen (or missed) a SANET posting about this article, which was
schedule to appear in the December issue of the Journal of the American College
of Nutrition.
Karen Anderson
NOFA-NJ
------------------------------------------------------ Study suggests nutrient decline in garden crops over past 50 years
Public release date: 1-Dec-2004
Study suggests nutrient decline in garden crops over past 50 years AUSTIN,
Texas – A recent study of 43 garden crops led by a University of Texas at Austin
biochemist suggests that their nutrient value has declined in recent decades
while farmers have been planting crops designed to improve other traits.
The study was designed to investigate the effects of modern agricultural
methods on the nutrient content of foods. The researchers chose garden crops,
mostly vegetables, but also melons and strawberries, for which nutritional data
were available from both 1950 and 1999 and compared them both individually and
as a group.
The study, based on U.S. Department of Agriculture data, will appear in the
December issue of the Journal of the American College of Nutrition. Its lead
author is Dr. Donald Davis of the university's Biochemical Institute in the
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. His coauthors are Drs. Melvin Epp and
Hugh Riordan of the Bio-Communications Research Institute in Wichita, Kan.,
where Davis is a research consultant.
According to Davis, establishing meaningful changes in nutrient content
over a 50-year time interval was a significant challenge. The researchers had to
compensate for variations in moisture content that affect nutrient measurements,
and could not rule out the possibility that changes in analytical techniques may
have affected results for some nutrients.
"It is much more reliable to look at average changes in the group rather
than in individual foods, due to uncertainties in the 1950 and 1999 values,"
Davis said. "Considered as a group, we found that six out of 13 nutrients showed
apparently reliable declines between 1950 and 1999."
These nutrients included protein, calcium, phosphorus, iron, riboflavin and
ascorbic acid. The declines, which ranged from 6 percent for protein to 38
percent for riboflavin, raise significant questions about how modern agriculture
practices are affecting food crops.
"We conclude that the most likely explanation was changes in cultivated
varieties used today compared to 50 years ago," Davis said. "During those 50
years, there have been intensive efforts to breed new varieties that have
greater yield, or resistance to pests, or adaptability to different climates.
But the dominant effort is for higher yields. Emerging evidence suggests that
when you select for yield, crops grow bigger and faster, but they don't
necessarily have the ability to make or uptake nutrients at the same, faster
rate."
According to Davis, these results suggest a need for research into other
important nutrients and foods that provide significant dietary calories, such as
grains, legumes, meat, milk and eggs.
"Perhaps more worrisome would be declines in nutrients we could not study
because they were not reported in 1950 -- magnesium, zinc, vitamin B-6, vitamin
E and dietary fiber, not to mention phytochemicals," Davis said. "I hope our
paper will encourage additional studies in which old and new crop varieties are
studied side-by-side and measured by modern methods."
  ***************************************************** To unsubscribe from SANET-MG: 1- Visit http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html
and unsubscribe by typing in your e-mail address or; 2- Send a message to mailto:listserv@sare.org
from the address subscribed to the list. Type "unsubscribe sanet-mg"
in the body of the message.   Visit the SANET-MG archives at: http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html   |