Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

[Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@bigfoot.com>]

On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 07:26:47PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> I will not do so. I think the Open Publication is a good license. I think
> that option B (but not A) is an excellent option for corporations and
> individuals alike.

Yet there is a restriction on commercial reprint.
Harmless for the LDP; but not free. We shouldn't restrain people from
making money with free software !

(BTW read your excellent resonse to kuro5hin article; I agree at 80% :-)

-- 
Guylhem P. Aznar                               http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu                    http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -----  Benjamin Franklin


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org