[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: driver's ed. is a joke



In article <3ugh5r$r8l@ceylon.gte.com>
Jeff Witzer <muthiah@sunflash.eng.usf.edu> writes:

> So...hows about the auto insurance industry setting up safety equiptment
> users schedules seperate from non-safety equiptment users like life
> insurance companies do for smokers and non-smokers?  Drivers would
> volunteer their safety/non-safety status and be charged appropriate
> rates (non-safety being much higher due to the insurance companies'
> higer risk of payout).  The liars (those who claim to use but really
> don't) would not be covered for ANY claims caused by an accident in
> which it can be proven they were not using the appropriate safety
> equiptment.

They already do. You can get discounts for anti-lock barkes and
airbags.


Follow-Ups: References: