You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Jul 2004

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00248 Jul 2004

 
Jul 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


nAdudai mannar
deemed possession and ownership
 
Lord krishNA went as an emissary of pANdavA-s who did not have any kingdom at that time. In fact, His mission was to recover the kingdom.
 
In thiru-voi-mozhi nam-AzhwAr mentions Lord krishNA as an emissary of king who had the kingdom. How is it that?
 
As per Lord krshNA's esteemed opinion, the kingdom was theirs and hence, they were deemed as having the kingdom already.
 
the pAsuram runs as follows:
",..nAdudai mannarkku, dhUthu sel nambikku" 6-6-5;
 
EDu vyAkyAnam is excellent in this regard. Questioning the validity of mentioning that they possess the kingdom -when in fact the whole mission if for that purpose-when in fact dven a drop of land was refused to them- it is mentioned that :
 
" bhagavath abiprAyathAlEa avanai nAdudai mannar engiRAr kANum"
 
 
The Lord deems pANdavAs as the possession of kingdom and that comes out as AzhwAr-s pAsuram.
 
The opinion of the Lord thus makes what is not as a deemed possession and ownership. Is it not?
vanamamalai padmanabhan
 
 
 
 
 

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list