nAdudai
mannar
deemed possession and
ownership
Lord krishNA went as an emissary of pANdavA-s who
did not have any kingdom at that time. In fact, His mission was to recover the
kingdom.
In thiru-voi-mozhi nam-AzhwAr mentions Lord krishNA
as an emissary of king who had the kingdom. How is it that?
As per Lord krshNA's esteemed opinion, the kingdom
was theirs and hence, they were deemed as having the kingdom
already.
the pAsuram runs as follows:
",..nAdudai mannarkku, dhUthu
sel nambikku" 6-6-5;
EDu vyAkyAnam is excellent in this regard.
Questioning the validity of mentioning that they possess the kingdom -when in
fact the whole mission if for that purpose-when in fact dven a drop of land was
refused to them- it is mentioned that :
" bhagavath abiprAyathAlEa
avanai nAdudai mannar engiRAr kANum"
The Lord deems pANdavAs as the possession of
kingdom and that comes out as AzhwAr-s pAsuram.
The opinion of the Lord thus makes what is not
as a deemed possession and ownership. Is it not?
vanamamalai
padmanabhan
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |