You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Jul 2008

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00009 Jul 2008

 
Jul 2008 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Padmanaban swamin,

It is well known that one of the reasons for Udaiyavar not giving a
vyakyanam for Azhwar srisookthis is that people usually dont comment
on a moolam which Udaiyavar already had commented. Thus Udaiyavar did
not want to stop the divyanubhavams of his sishyas from pouring out as
vyakyanams. If PVP swamin's commentary has to be the only commentary
and all anubhavams should be revolving about it then it would mean
that Swami Desikan had committed apacharam by writing Nigama Parimalam.

Coming to the parrot episode. Swami Desikan in Sampradaya prakriya
bhaagam of Srimad Rahasya Traya Saram mentions that he is a mere
parrot who was taught to speak by Appullar. Appullar and Swami Desikan
are Acharya purushaas belong to our Emperumaanaar Darsanam. So it is
apt to mention the anubhavam of Uthamoor swami alluding to Desikan and
Appullar. When Madhavakannan swami clearly mentions that he is giving
us the divyanubhavams of Uthamoor swami, there is no reason for
confusion. Those who feel that Uthamoor swami's vyakyanams are
saampradayic would relish others would skip it.

Dasan,
Aravindalochanadasanudasan
 

--- In Oppiliappan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Padmanabhan" <aazhwar@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Sri Madhavakannan svAmy,
> 
> 
> This largely differs from the vyakyanam of Sri PerivyavAchAn PiLLai.
> 
> There is no reference to Sri appuLLAr or SvAmy Desikan in the vyAkyanam.
> 
> There is a reference of Sri Periya Nambi and vudayvar -PeriyaNambi
prostrating towards vudayvar.
> 
> 2. Since your articles are carried in groups in English, there is a
tendency to take it as original vaykayanam. Hence, the value of
translation is very high for certain groups of people.
> 
> 3. You may have sources like Sri UthaMur svAmy or Sri PBA Svamy or
Sri Mathivanan. However, these become secondary when they do not
conform with the original commentaries.
> 
> 4. The secondary commentaries - divyartha dhepikais - are only for
assisting to understand the original vyAkyanam-s and cannot supersede
the vyAkyanam-s themselves- in case there is deviations.
> 
> 5. I am sure you will understand my viewpoint. Thanks
> 
> adiyan ramanuja dasan
> vanamamalai padmanabhan
>



------------------------------------

Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan
http://www.sadagopan.org Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Oppiliappan-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Oppiliappan-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list