srImathE rAmAnujAya namaha srImadh varavara munayE namaha Dear Sri Mani, Sri Venkatesh Elayavalli and all, I agree to your views and I sincerely apologize for this piece of posting. After reading through, I realised that this para was unwarranted and should not have been included. Sorry for the offense from my end. I assure you that I will be more careful in future. AzhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigaLE saraNam adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh --- In ramanuja@xxxx, "elayavalli" <elayavalli@xxxx> wrote: > Sri: > SrimathE Ramanujaya Namaha: > AzhwAr EmperumAnAr Jeeyar thiruvadigalE Saranam, > > Dear Sri Venkatesh > > With due respects I have to come to Mani's defence here. There is no > reason to bringing in a different hearsay to a discussion that is not > related to the initial question. As you and others believe, mani's > question was not intended to counter a traditional belief under some > ulterior motive. Given that it is not fair to bring up a tangential > topic and then apologising for bringing it up. Please, let us not > fall into this trap of he said, she said issues, which will only make > things worse. > > Thanks > > > Venkatesh Elayavilli > > > On the other hand, I came to know a disturbing hearsay, that, as > Sri > > emberumAnAr in Thirumalai is not wearing a kAshAya vasthram and > also > > since he has a vyAkhyA mudhrai, this is actually Swamy dEsikan and > > only the thenkalais, later converted this to Sri emberumAnAr. > Please > > do not say that none of you heard this. This is a very very popular > > rumour. Any clues on this? I am sorry to have dragged this argument > > into another potential thread. But I did this to let you all know > how > > the hearsays, can be true and false both to either of the sect or > > people. But what I am surprised in this is that the question is on > > Sri emberumAnAr's sannidhi, who is undisputedly the greatest > AchArya > > for both the sects. This is not on a sannidhi of Sri maNavALa > > mAmunigaL or Sri dEsikar. So what are we going to gain with this > and > > what is the clarification one is expecting. I am sure nobody, who > is > > rational, will say Sri Mani was wrong when he initiated this. While > > Sri Mani's view is one possible view, the other view is also > another > > possibility. I think this has to be left just here.
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |