You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2002

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00138 Apr 2002

 
Apr 2002 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Sri .Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh
Your mail came at the correct time for me in the line of discussion about
kalai diffs,
Adiyen of the view that just by discussing some thing controversial we are
not hurting any feeling , also only by discussion we will come to know the
truth and by keeping the views within ourselves. Sure this will never create
any hatred(thVesham) upon others..
(e.g) The upanyasam of Sri.M.A.VenkataKrishnan swamy, he has been talking
about all minute details to the core without affecting any Bhagavada's
feeling (received appreciation from both sects), so discussion per say is
not catastrophic.

Reg the Emberumanar's sannidhi , I also heard from some groups that it was
Swamy Desikan's sannidhi and was converted later to Bhasyakarar Sannidhi,
So hearsay always play a role, Adiyen also not clear about the root of this
gossip and its better if we know further details/background about this,
This list is not a controversial list and everyone knows what other
Bhagavada's feeling is and so I feel if any one specially SriVaishnavas
closely connected with Thirumalai can enlighten the list on this reg, and I
am sure this will not create any heated arguments/feelings, its only getting
ourselves aware.

Best Regards

Gunaseelan Venkatachary
Ph - 408 588 6672 (W)
guna_venkat@xxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "vinjamoor_venkatesh" <vinjamoorvenkat@xxxx>
To: <ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: [ramanuja] Re: hearsay etc.,


> srImathE rAmAnujAya namaha
> srImadh varavara munayE namaha
>
> Dear Sri Mani, Sri Venkatesh Elayavalli and all,
>
> I agree to your views and I sincerely apologize for this piece of
> posting. After reading through, I realised that this para was
> unwarranted and should not have been included. Sorry for the offense
> from my end. I assure you that I will be more careful in future.
>
> AzhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigaLE saraNam
> adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan
> Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh
>
>
>
> --- In ramanuja@xxxx, "elayavalli" <elayavalli@xxxx> wrote:
> > Sri:
> > SrimathE Ramanujaya Namaha:
> > AzhwAr EmperumAnAr Jeeyar thiruvadigalE Saranam,
> >
> > Dear Sri Venkatesh
> >
> > With due respects I have to come to Mani's defence here. There is
> no
> > reason to bringing in a different hearsay to a discussion that is
> not
> > related to the initial question. As you and others believe, mani's
> > question was not intended to counter a traditional belief under
> some
> > ulterior motive. Given that it is not fair to bring up a tangential
> > topic and then apologising for bringing it up. Please, let us not
> > fall into this trap of he said, she said issues, which will only
> make
> > things worse.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Venkatesh Elayavilli
> >
> > > On the other hand, I came to know a disturbing hearsay, that, as
> > Sri
> > > emberumAnAr in Thirumalai is not wearing a kAshAya vasthram and
> > also
> > > since he has a vyAkhyA mudhrai, this is actually Swamy dEsikan
> and
> > > only the thenkalais, later converted this to Sri emberumAnAr.
> > Please
> > > do not say that none of you heard this. This is a very very
> popular
> > > rumour. Any clues on this? I am sorry to have dragged this
> argument
> > > into another potential thread. But I did this to let you all know
> > how
> > > the hearsays, can be true and false both to either of the sect or
> > > people. But what I am surprised in this is that the question is
> on
> > > Sri emberumAnAr's sannidhi, who is undisputedly the greatest
> > AchArya
> > > for both the sects. This is not on a sannidhi of Sri maNavALa
> > > mAmunigaL or Sri dEsikar. So what are we going to gain with this
> > and
> > > what is the clarification one is expecting. I am sure nobody, who
> > is
> > > rational, will say Sri Mani was wrong when he initiated this.
> While
> > > Sri Mani's view is one possible view, the other view is also
> > another
> > > possibility. I think this has to be left just here.
>
>
>
> azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list