SrimathE rAmAnujaya Namaha,
Dear Sri Vishnu,
You are right emperuman doesn't expect anything from us. Only this fact has
stopped mandhi bhuddis like adiyen from doing anything properly. Adiyen has the
lowest of the lowest anushtanam ('neesanEn niraivondrumilEn' but emperuman does
shower his grace on me too 'enkan pAsam vaiththa param sudar jOdhi'). But this
doesn't add any fame as we are setting an wrong example for the generations to
come. That is why atleast by words adiyen insisted the necessity of following
our acharya's anushtanams (practically adiyen follows zero and hence has/is
doing the maximum apacharams possible but atleast feels for adiyen's
incapability and each moment begs the pardon from bhagavan and our acharyas for
the same). Only when we get the ultimate qualification of "sarva dharmAn
parithyajya" we can leave everything (here remember we should leave everything
not do one thing which we like to do and leave that which is difficult or
boring to do). But even if we leave now it is not going to affect us in anyway
since we have the strength of our acharyas who will take us straight to the
divine feet of emperuman ("jnAna anushtAnamivai nandrAgavE udaiyanAna guruvai
adaindhakkAl thEnAr kamala thirumAmagal kozhunan thAnE vaikundam tarum"). As a
Srivaishnavite it is enough if we just get immersed in the arulicheyals of
azhvars and acharyas and spend our time (kalashepam) with bhagavat/bhagavata
kainkaryam. In that case, we should refrain ourselves from doing rituals like
ayushhomam, marriage homams, gruhapravesa homams etc also (if you are willing
to do such homams then we have to satisfy the basic qualification for the same.
Sastras say that one who has left sandhi is not eligible for any of these
rituals. so we either leave all these or do them with the necessary
qualification else it doesn't serve the purpose atall and it is sheer waste of
time). Actually we have to purify our new homes only with the padhadhooli of a
bhagavata and cherish the same like periya nambigal. How many of us arrange for
recitation of 4000 paasurams and grand dhadheeyArAdhanam to bhagavatas atleast
for all so called auspicious occasions in our life? (actually only such a
recitation and bhagavata kainkaryam is auspicious occasions in our life). Let
us stop discussing whether we have do sandhi or not and concentrate on more
constructive subjects (bhagavat anubhavams). It is no harm in us spending 15 to
30 mts in a day for doing sandhi as a kainkaryam to emperuman and then spending
our day with bhagavat/bhagavata kainkaryams. Nothing is for our pleasure
everything is only for his happiness ("padiyAi kidandhu vun pavalavAi kAnbEnE")
All mistakes are due to adiyen's ignorance so please forgive them.
Alwar empermAnAr Jeeyer thiruvadigalE sharaNam
Adiyen ramanuja dAsee
Sumithra Varadarajan
----- Original Message -----
From: Vishnu
To: ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:58 PM
Subject: [ramanuja] Re: Digest Number 731 - Sandhya/Gayathri related
>
> Sandhyavandhanam has been prescribed by the sastras and emperuman
himself declares that "shruthi smriti mamai Agya...AgyA chebhi mama
drOhi mama bhakthai.. na vaishnavA:" So we have no right to feel the
orders of emperuman to be boring and leave them. Our acharyas give
us only an exemption when it clashes with visEsha dharmam
(bhagavat/bhAgavata kainkaryam). Are all of us always involved in
kainkaryam? Then sandhi need not be done. But we do lot of lowkika
jobs then why leave the sastric rituals with fake excuses.
Dear Ms Sumithra,
u r right in saying that we are all in lowkika jobs. Also it is tru
that SrI rAmAnuja and varavara were the best examples of vedic
ascetics, much better than the Rushis of prev yugas. however, most of
their time was spent in the primary anushtAnam of propagating the
aruLiccheyals of AlwArs. If we lowkikas spend time in rituals, what
about following the sampradAyam?
It is true that Lord says:
Sruti smurti mamaiva AgnA.. etc. But what do the SAstras say about a
bhAgavata? Anyone who is not averse to paying obeisance to Him is a
bhAgavata (Periya Thirumozhi .. kadanmallai pASurams). then where is
the expectation by God for us to do something?
Also why should we take the SlOka quoted by you terms of rituals? why
not in terms of morals and good conduct (which has more relevance in
terms of bhAgavata kainkaryam - a primary anushtAnam)?
>If we are true followers of Swamy Ramanuja then we should follow his
>anushtanam. Swamy who had such great paripakam could have easily
>left doing
>sandhya vandhanam and concentrated in azhvar paasurams alone but he
>didnt do
>that.
As I said primary anushtAnam is adherence to Alwars' aruLichheyals
(again not ritualistically chanting "naharam aruL purindhu..", "neri
vASal thAnEyAy ninrAnai.." etc. without practising the meaning
therein). Sri Bhattar says that a Srivaishnava should live like a
hen, where he indicates that one has to primarily concentrate on the
quintessence of all Sastras i.e. the prabandham (which itself is the
primary Sastra).
also it is for emberumAn to put us in any kanikaryam He wants
(samuchitA vrtti .. as said in ashtaSlOkI). So one need not feel he
is going against Sastras if he does not to sandhyA. our God does not
have any expectation from us and no practice can be an
exception, right! at the same time, one can do it as a kainkaryam.
> There should be only a change in attitude while doing them.
>Srivaishnavas, should do sandhya vandhanam as a kainkaryam to
>emperuman (following his words gives him happiness) and for not any
>other result. At this point remember Sri Pillai ulagariyan's
>sutra "karmamum kainkaryaththilE pugum".
Sri PiLLai lOkAchArya says "karma can also join kainkaryam
(karmamum...)".
>
> Doing sandhya vandhanam will not achieve Srivaishnavas any results
>as they have to do it only as a kainkaryam to emperuman but not
>doing will surely create unhappiness in emperuman's minds as we are
>disregarding his words.
As I said, He does not have any expectaion from us so does not become
unhappy. Also we are not disregarding His words (ref. "naharam aruL
purindhu..." is His AgnA).
Our AchAryas say (in commentaries) we have to do anything we do for
His happiness. Then does it not become an effort on our part and
contradict their own words that He is the upAya? To this, what I heard
is, like a slave who tries to please his master, we should also do
whatever we do in the mood of pleasing Him. We should not think
whatever we are doing is for our pleasure. That is what our AchAryas
mean.
> "Avan manam kanni pOga nAm kAranamAgalAmA?" >Srivaishnavas need not
>do anything he will grant moksha by his >nirheduka krupai but can we
>just sit without going kainkaryam for >his happiness? We can spend
>our time (kAlashEpam) primely with >bhagavat/bhAgavata vishayam but
>how much time will it take to do all >the daily routines prescribed
>by our sastras for our varnAshrama.
To do all the daily routines will certainly take a lot of time.
definitely sandhyAvandanam does not take much time.
adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan
Vishnu
azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |