Sri: Srimathe Ramanujaya nama: Dear Sri TCA Venkatesan, Humble praNAms to you. AdisEsha/lakshmaNa/rAmAnuja(than the Lord reclining on it) has brainwashed me:-)so,can't help it. Not only did lakshmaNa disobey the brother in trEta yugam but also in this kaliyugam emperumAnAr disobeyed thirukkOshtiyUr nambi! All these posts add another dimension(and add strength) to our love for our favorite(like mine for lakshmaNa and like yours for satrghna (analogous to madhurakavi):-)). I am going to stretch this post further wrt pAratantryam and sEshatvam! Just kidding. Probably I will post it later after I check with Sri Vanamamalai Padmanabhan. I am stuck with lakshmaNa no matter what happens!!! The more you say against lakshmaNa I will become more protective over lakshmaNa. So you are losing the game:-) AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam dAsAnu dAsI NC Nappinnai --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, TCA Venkatesan <vtca@xxxx> wrote: > Sri: > Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama: > > --- vaidhehi_nc <nappinnai_nc@xxxx> wrote: > > Even if Srirama > > Himself comes and denies I will only say NO to Him. > > Now this is not a sign of a paratantra :-). Whatever > Rama says you will have to agree, to be like Bharata. > > > PerumAl says "I can give up > > sIta, I can > > give you/lakshmaNa up and I can give up my own life but > > not my vow". > > The part where Rama says He will give even Sita up is > interesting. This occurs in the Aranya Khandam where > Rama gives a vow to the Rishis that He will kill the > asuras and protect them. Sita tells Him that He is not > in the forest to take up such duties and that He should > desist from doing so. At this point, Rama makes this > statement. > > Now, why would Sita ask Rama not to do this? This is > very unusual behavious for Her. The explanation for > this, is that Sita knew that She had to separate from > Rama, in order to take care of the reason why they had > come down to Earth - notice the use of the phrase > "siRai irundhavaL ERRam" in SriVacanaBhushanam rather > than "siRaippattavaL ERRam". But, She was not sure > whether Rama could handle separation from Her. So, > She tested Him with Her statement. When She heard His > reply, She was satisfied that He would be able to > handle Her separation in order to keep His original > vow. > > Now, I do not know where any of this is leading - but > does bhagavat and bhAgavata anubhavam have to lead > anywhere? The discussions on Lakshmana & Bharata's > greatness - and now Sita's greatness - are so wonderful, > that the journey is itself the goal. > > Azhvar Emberumanar Jeeyar Thiruvadigale Sharanam > > adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |