Re: [compost_tea] Re: Flow forms

From: L Blair <rlbct_at_clear.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:45:21 +1300
Thats great news, Ted
I would like to be part of the experiment, but being in New Zealand am
probably too far away for you.
Any info on the other critters (fungi, protozoa etc?)
Lynton

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Peterson" <ted.peterson_at_tcsn.net>
To: <compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [compost_tea] Re: Flow forms


Folks:

I have been experimenting with flow-form (kind of) technology (actually a
way to make a certain kind of water molecule) and came up with a design that
was supposed to make a certain kind of water.  Well, it sort of worked --
the water circulated correctly --  but mostly failed.  However it was a
momentous failure!  I failed to get the water I wanted but stumbled onto
something else.  I have been running the new technology next to one of my
brewers and a competitor's brewer and I will simply state that the results I
have measured are off the map.  Everything worked better,  the bacteria I
can see with the microscope simply exploded.  Rods and cocci everywhere.
When I first looked at the sample, I thought I had gotten a piece of plastic
or something in the sample.  I have never seen so much activity.   I brewed
the same amount of compost from the same pile and with the same nutrients
measured by weight.  All the water was the same. I can say this.  Flow
forms, even simple ones, seem to work because they add O2 and increase
surface area.

I need 5 people to sign an non-disclosure agreement and do some testing.
You will have to invest about $35 to $50  in parts and I will give you exact
specifications of what you need and how you need to do it.  You can get the
parts locally.  I then need you to send samples to me so I can compare them
with that I am seeing.  After I get some confirmation, I will have everyone
send one sample to Elaine.  I will pay for the sample and the testing with
SFI.

I really think I have accidently hit on something quite fantastic here but
further experimentation and confirmation from other people are needed.  When
I say more bioactivity, I mean I was blown away with the samples.  My
brewers are good.  They make good tea but this is an order of magnitude
improvement.  I had no idea.  And the best part about it is that it is far
less expensive than the technology I was using before.  It is about $200
less expensive to build.

To Tom:

A vortex by any other name is a vortex.  While my brewers have lots of air
actions and water circultation, this new approach creates vortices.  I am
flat blown away.

I will apply for patents Monday and have an ND ready by Wednesday at the
latest.  So if anyone is interested, please drop me a line.

Nick and Judy:

You should have received the package but if you haven't, I have gotten most
of it on line so I can just send it that way.

Look folks.  I am stoked out of my mind.  I never thought that this would
happen like this but before I get too carried away with my own
self-delusion, I need some confirmation.  It would be the happiest accident
I could think of.  However, the water molecule stuff just flat failed.
Great idea but doesn't work as I am using it.  So I guess NASA was correct
in rejecting it.

Ted Peterson
SOE


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links

Received on Mon Dec 20 2004 - 13:32:23 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:39 EST