Re: [compost_tea] Re: Flow forms
Thats great news, Ted
I would like to be part of the experiment, but being in New Zealand am
probably too far away for you.
Any info on the other critters (fungi, protozoa etc?)
Lynton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Peterson" <ted.peterson_at_tcsn.net>
To: <compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [compost_tea] Re: Flow forms
Folks:
I have been experimenting with flow-form (kind of) technology (actually a
way to make a certain kind of water molecule) and came up with a design that
was supposed to make a certain kind of water. Well, it sort of worked --
the water circulated correctly -- but mostly failed. However it was a
momentous failure! I failed to get the water I wanted but stumbled onto
something else. I have been running the new technology next to one of my
brewers and a competitor's brewer and I will simply state that the results I
have measured are off the map. Everything worked better, the bacteria I
can see with the microscope simply exploded. Rods and cocci everywhere.
When I first looked at the sample, I thought I had gotten a piece of plastic
or something in the sample. I have never seen so much activity. I brewed
the same amount of compost from the same pile and with the same nutrients
measured by weight. All the water was the same. I can say this. Flow
forms, even simple ones, seem to work because they add O2 and increase
surface area.
I need 5 people to sign an non-disclosure agreement and do some testing.
You will have to invest about $35 to $50 in parts and I will give you exact
specifications of what you need and how you need to do it. You can get the
parts locally. I then need you to send samples to me so I can compare them
with that I am seeing. After I get some confirmation, I will have everyone
send one sample to Elaine. I will pay for the sample and the testing with
SFI.
I really think I have accidently hit on something quite fantastic here but
further experimentation and confirmation from other people are needed. When
I say more bioactivity, I mean I was blown away with the samples. My
brewers are good. They make good tea but this is an order of magnitude
improvement. I had no idea. And the best part about it is that it is far
less expensive than the technology I was using before. It is about $200
less expensive to build.
To Tom:
A vortex by any other name is a vortex. While my brewers have lots of air
actions and water circultation, this new approach creates vortices. I am
flat blown away.
I will apply for patents Monday and have an ND ready by Wednesday at the
latest. So if anyone is interested, please drop me a line.
Nick and Judy:
You should have received the package but if you haven't, I have gotten most
of it on line so I can just send it that way.
Look folks. I am stoked out of my mind. I never thought that this would
happen like this but before I get too carried away with my own
self-delusion, I need some confirmation. It would be the happiest accident
I could think of. However, the water molecule stuff just flat failed.
Great idea but doesn't work as I am using it. So I guess NASA was correct
in rejecting it.
Ted Peterson
SOE
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
| |
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on Mon Dec 20 2004 - 13:32:23 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:39 EST