[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: NY TIMES SLAMS ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE ON FRONT PAGE
The odd thing is that these articles *were* on the NYT web site, but were
removed. I read them there and printed them out. When I went back later,
they were gone (even though older articles were still up on the site). I
asked about this in a posting to their subscriber forum, and here's the
response I got from Bernard Gwertzman, Senior Editor, 6/22/96
:We as a rule do not archive articles. And until we have our archive
:service working, there is no way for you to get those two back articles
:from the web page site. we will soon have an archive service.Also, on
:america online on the times site, i believe at least one of those
:articles is archived.
I posted another note requesting that they reload the articles to the
Web site, since there's a lot of interest in reading them. If there are
other non-AOL subscribers out there who'd like to read the articles,
please contact the NYT subscriber's forum to express that thought. I
think you can get there by pointing your browser to
http://www3.nytimes.com/comment/thread.cgi/message/28?user=&email=&depth=3&detail=description&lastread=3
Thanks.
Della Noche wrote:
>
> Hmm. It appears that the NY Times is not going to publish this on their
> web page.
>
> My understanding is not so good but is something like you can write a
> summary and include quotes of no longer than (400 ?) words at a time.
>
> Still, the article did need to be brought to people's attention and many
> of us do not have access to back issues of this paper.
>
> What do you think would have been the best way to alert people to the NY
> Times' prostitution? I thought this was a very important alert.
>
> dn
>
> wright@clam.Hi.COM (David Wright) wrote:
> >you don't need to be Perry Mason to
> >know that republishing a NY Times article on Usenet is a no-no.
> >
> > -- David Wright :: wright@hi.com :: Not an Official Spokesman for Anyone
Follow-Ups:
References: