[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: The fallacy of DRLs



In article <42kf5k$i9q@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, protmp1@bnr.ca (Isaac Wong) wrote:

(snip)
->
->DRLs are supposed to be reduced-brightness low beams. They should not cause
->unnecessary distractions.

That's interesting; all of the new small Chevy trucks that I've seen with
DRL's seem to be reduced brightness high beams.  Very annoying, since they
are usually aimed high enough to be in your eyes.

Marty

-- 
A relevant signature is an oxymoron.


Follow-Ups: References: