Dear Sri Venkatesan, Kindly clarify whether the life incident of bhattar is quoted as an injunction to TK VaishNavas for the non-performance of sandhya? Regular performance of nityakarmas are typically ordained by dharma sUtras of one's vedic affiliation (it may appear in grhya sutras in some cases; smrti digests elaborate the dharma sUtras). >From my limited understanding rAmAnujAchArya never attempted to tamper the dharma sUtras, veda pramANas and the associated paraphernalia (and even sanctions sacrifice of goat in the context of yAgas in his gIta bhAshya). If I am right, the ashtAdasha bheda nirNaya discusses about nithyakarmas - "whether an evolved sould will go to hell if he doesn't perform them": yes -> vadakalai; no -> thenkalai, however the evolved soul should continue to do them as an example for others. This is a non question for unevolved souls! Accept my apologies if I've commited any mistakes or was offensive. Regards, Kasturi Rangan --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, TCA Venkatesan <vtca@xxxx> wrote: > Sri: > Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama: > > Dear Sri Ramachandran, > > While it is good to see your enthusiasm for performing > sandhyavandanam, the following lines are puzzling. > > > It is therefore, extremely critical and mandatory > > for the Sandhya to be performed without fail. It > > is quite surprising that Shri Vishnu has > > questioned the efficacy of Sandhya and perhaps > > thinks of replacing the Sandhya with 'namaa' > > chanting. Come what may, the Sandhya is a nitya > > karma ordained by the Vedas and no one is excused. > > Dilution of Sandhya requirements are therefore out > > of question. One may dilute all other rituals, > > worship etc. but not the Sandhya. > > Is it your stand or our pUrvAchAryas stand that > other rituals and even worship can be 'diluted' > but not the sandhyavandanam. Is there any pramANam > for this stance? > > Of course, the sastras themselves excuse many from > performing the sandhya. So, how is that you say that > no one is excused? Or do you mean only those that > are eligible for it. > > Certainly our acharyas did not give up their nithya > karmas, but only so as to not set the wrong example > for those who are at the first steps. However, there > are two things here. I don't think they saw it as a > mandatory act which is an unforgivable sin when > missed, as you are stating ; and they only saw > it as a kainkaryam to the Lord and not for their > personal benefits. And again, I believe their stress > was on all nithya karmas and not just the sandhya > alone. > > Guru Paramapara records that Bhattar refused to > stop his fan service to the Lord for the sake > of doing sandhyavandanam. > > Pillai Lokacharyar includes the performance of all > nithya karmas as one of the sins that the Lord > wipes out in the "sarva pApEbhyO" of the Charama > shloka. > > Kindly clarify. > > adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |