You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Feb 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00064 Feb 2004

 
Feb 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear srEvaishNavites,

It is true that bhudhAvathArA is not an incarnation. However, as pointed out, 
it may be a small act by the Lord Himself without being an avathAram in 
particular. 
The following is reference to this in thiru-voi-mozhi

"kaLLa vEdathai koNdu pOi puram pukkavArum, kalandhu asurarai bhEdham seidhittu 
vuyir vuNda upAyangaLum...' 5-10-4.

The mention in Edu, irupathi nAlAyirappadi and onbadhAyirappadi -->' 
bhaudhAvathAra vrudhAntham ennai naliyA ninRadhu engiRAr"

It was already mentioned in the earlier messages that;

a BuddhAvatharan who came to mislead the asurans with false teachings, this 
Buddha was not the same Buddha . I think this is right.
dhasan
vanamamalai padmanabhan




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list