You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Sep 2006

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00084 Sep 2006

 
Sep 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Senthil,

   Thank you very much to spend your time to enlighten me.

   Yes, I got the answers to all of my doubtm, and now my ignorance 
is removed.

    I got the answer for even Bhagavata Shlokas, where Shiva was 
praised during churning of milk ocean (Those prasings were by 
Devathas and just to make him ready for swallowing the poison, and 
whatever the Puranic statemnt contradicts with Shruthi is not the 
valid truth.) 

  And I came to know that Rudra is also a jeeva (his sinful birth 
stated by Sathapatha Brahmana and many other Upanishads cleared 
that .)

  There are many quotes in Upanishds which reveal Narayana as 
paramAtma (and the NArAyaNa can't be associated with any other deity 
other than Lakshmi pathy as per Panini grammar, this is enough to 
refute all other vadaas).

 Bhallaveya Shrthi is very clear that mentions all names are 
primarily belong to Vishnu , so wherever Shruthi explains Brahman 
with other names(Rudra,Shamhu,Shiva,Indra,Hiranyagarbha etc.,) those  
refer to Narayan only, otherwise nobody can interpret the Vedas 
without contradictions.

  Purusha Suktham is very clear that mentions "HrEschatE , 
LakshmIscha patnyaow" (Parama purusha has wives Bhoodevi and Lakshmi 
devi ).

  And there are no.of Upanishad vakyAs to prove Sreeman Narayana's 
paratvam without any doubt.

  "yasya tathA kapyAsam pudarIkamEvamakshiNI" , it clearly tells that 
Paramtma has the two(AkshinI is in dviteeya samasam) beutiful lotus 
like eyes (which proves Brahman is not Rudra who has three eyes 
("tryaksha soola pAnih"), not Brahma who has four heads and 8 eyes .

 Narayana is "apahatapApmA divyo deva Eko Narayana" , who has no sins
(no karma), where as Rudra is "anapahatpApma" , clearly tells Rudra 
is also under Karma bondage like any other jeeva. (so he is not even 
avtara of Narayana).

  Thanks for your help.

 Adiyen.
 Kannan
 
  
  
--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, senthil b <b_senthil2002@...> wrote:
>
> Dear bhagavathAs,
> 
> adiyEn will try to prove that Sriman Narayanan
> is parantattvam by using paasurams from 
> Thirumazhisai Alwar who is best to condemn
> all other sAshtrAs.
> 
> adiyEn will now try to give some pasurams which 
> conforms the supremeness, parantattvam of Sriman
> Narayanan.
> 
> 1)In pasuram 53: (nAnmugam thiruvanthAthi)
> 
> "...................- pollAtha
> thEvaraith thEvarallAraith thiruvillAth
> thEvaraith thErElmin thEvu."
> 
> In the above pasuram, Alwar states that, he wont
> consider others as "dEvar" or "deivam", because 
> they dont have any sampandham with Sri Devi Naachiyar.
> 
> The person who had sampandham with Sri Mahalaksmi
> is none other than Sriman Narayanan, is considered
> to be "deivam" or "dEvar". Others including
> "brahma-rudrAdhigal" aren't considered as
> "deivam or dEvar".
> 
> Now, the saivites starts refusing Alwar by saying
> that, "You state that, only Narayanan is deivam,
> others aren't. Then the sAshtrAs says that, your
> lord is one of person who born along with Indran as 
> UpEndran during Vaama Avataram, and one among
> trimurtis "brahma-vishnu-rudran". Then the dosha's
> for the brahma-rudrAdhi's wont comes to your lord
> also? Because, vishnu is also one dEvar among the
> brahma-rudrAdhi's."
> 
> To this question, now Thirumazhisai Alwar refutes
> clearly in his 54 Pasuram in nAnmugam thiruvanthAthi.
> 
> 2.paasuram 54
> 
> "thEvarAi  niRkumath-thEvum  ath-thEvaril
> moovarAi niRkum muthupunarppum ? yaavarAi
> niRkindrathellAm nedumAlen rOrAthAr
> karginRa thellAm kadai."
> 
> The alwar says that "even though HE born as brother 
> to Indran and stood as one dEvar among trimurti's,
> it is true that HE is antharyAmi to brhama-rudhrAdhi's
> which is explained by Vishnu Puraanam as
> 
> "srushtisdhithyanthakaranIm  brahmavishnusivAthmikAm |
> sa samj~nam yaathi bhagavAnEga  Eva  janArthdhana: ||
> "
>                            [Vishnu Puranam 1.2-66 ]
> 
> muthpunarppum ? old avathAram of Sriman Narayanan;
> muthu ? old ;  punarppu ? sankalpam ;
> It means that it's an avataram due to HIS sankalpam. 
> Not like others as due to their karmam, they took
> birth
> which is stated in Purusha Sooktam as follows:
> 
> "thripAthUrdhva udhaith purusha: padhOsyEhAbhavAth 
> puna:"
>                                [Purusha Sooktam]
> 
> Even in Gita Lord Krishna says that HE took birth due 
> to HIS sankalpa roopa gna~nam. "sambhavAmyAthmamAyayA"
> 
> Eventhough HE stood one among trimUrti's, HE is none 
> other than avatAram of Parama Purushan Sriman 
> Narayanan. 
> 
> In next word - "yaavarAi nirkinrathellAm" -alwar
> proves
> that as a Parantattvam, HE stood to withhold all the 
> chethanAs' and sarva pathArthangal like dEvar, 
> manushyar, thiryak, sthAvaram, etc., Apart from HIM, 
> emperuman is in all other things which is different 
> from HIS roopam, qualities, etc., through "vyApakam"
> HE gives roopam, naamam to all those things which 
> different from HIM. HE only born as Upendran, Vishnu 
> among trimurti's.
> 
> 1.thEvarAi  niRkumath-thEvum ? born as Upendran,    
> brother to Indran during Vaamana Avataram
> 
> 2.moovarAi niRkum muthupunarppum ? old avataram of 
> Sriman Narayanan as Vishnu among trimurti's
> 
> 3.yaavarAi niRkindrathellAm  ?  all other things which
> 
> got its       saththai, roopam, naamam, et.c,
> 
> 4.nedumAlE     --   all the above are only Sriman 
> Narayanan, sarvEshwaran, paramporul;
> 
> Even though HE stood as one thEvar among Indran, 
> eventhough HE is one among trimurti's, ---- HE is none
> 
> other than the sarvEshwaran Sriman Narayanan, who 
> withstands in all chethanAchEshtithangal to provide 
> saththai, roopam, naamam etc., 
> 
> 5. enrOrAthAr karginRa thellAm kadai -- If you don't 
> know this, then what you have learned so far is waste.
> 
> 
> Thus through the above paasuram, Thirumazhisai alwar
> clearly proves the parantattvam of Sriman Narayanan 
> even though HE stood as thEvar one among trimurti's.
> 
> This paasuram is to CONDEMN those, who think that
> HE is one among trimurti's and equivalent to others.
> 
> adiyEn,
> senthil.b
> 
> Note: Suggestions and comments are Welcome!!!!!
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > \--- kannan_mukundam <kannan_mukundam@...>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Adiyen all Bhagavatas,
> > > 
> > >  I heard comments from some Shaivaties that ..in
> > > Bhagavata
> > > purana..while churning the milk ocean..when
> > Halahala
> > > appeared..all
> > > devatas along with Vishnu went to Shiva and prayed
> > > Shiva as follows:
> > > 
> > > 29. O lord, the five important Vedic mantras are
> > > represented by your
> > > five faces, from which the thirty-eight most
> > > celebrated Vedic mantras
> > > have been generated. Your Lordship, Lord Siva, you
> > > are self-
> > > illuminated. You are directly situated as the
> > > supreme truth, known as
> > > Paramatma.
> > > 
> > > 31. O Lord Girisa, since the impersonal Brahman
> > > effulgence is
> > > transcendental to the material modes of goodness,
> > > passion and
> > > ignorance, the various directors of this material
> > > world certainly
> > > cannot appreciate it or even know where it is. It
> > is
> > > not
> > > understandable even to Lord Brahma, Lord Visnu or
> > > the King of heaven,
> > > Mahendra.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  And also they claimed that Vishnu also born from
> > > Soma , they
> > > provided some Rigvedic mantras:
> > > 
> > > sómaH pavate janitaá matiinaáM janitaá divó
> > janitaá
> > > pRthivyaáH
> > > janitaágnér janitaá suúryasya janiténdrasya
> > janitótá
> > > víSNoH
> > > 
> > > 9.096.05 The Soma flows, the father of holy hymns,
> > > the father of
> > > heaven, the father of the earth, the father of
> > Agni,
> > > the father of
> > > the sun, the fatherwho begot Indra and Vis.n.u.
> > > 
> > >  They are claiming Shiva is supreme being, please
> > > let me know any of
> > > you that how can I refute these people who are
> > > decreasing Narayana's
> > > supremacy and they making there is some one else
> > > partvam then
> > > Narayana .
> > > 
> > >  I am eagerly waiting for your replies..
> > > 
> > > Adiyen
> > > Kannan.M
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >             
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn
> > something new
> > http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
> http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
>









Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam 
http://www.vedics.net

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list