[compost_tea] Re: Flow forms
Ted,
We have been using a flow form for one brewer but it involves a low
pressure water pump. I was under the impression that you did not use
water pumps. If you don't mind could you tell me if you are using a
flow form without a water pump? (if that's possible)
Regards,
Titel
--- In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, "Ted Peterson"
<ted.peterson_at_t...> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I have been experimenting with flow-form (kind of) technology
(actually a way to make a certain kind of water molecule) and came
up with a design that was supposed to make a certain kind of water.
Well, it sort of worked -- the water circulated correctly -- but
mostly failed. However it was a momentous failure! I failed to get
the water I wanted but stumbled onto something else. I have been
running the new technology next to one of my brewers and a
competitor's brewer and I will simply state that the results I have
measured are off the map. Everything worked better, the bacteria I
can see with the microscope simply exploded. Rods and cocci
everywhere. When I first looked at the sample, I thought I had
gotten a piece of plastic or something in the sample. I have never
seen so much activity. I brewed the same amount of compost from
the same pile and with the same nutrients measured by weight. All
the water was the same. I can say this. Flow forms, even simple
ones, seem to work because they add O2 and increase surface area.
>
> I need 5 people to sign an non-disclosure agreement and do some
testing. You will have to invest about $35 to $50 in parts and I
will give you exact specifications of what you need and how you need
to do it. You can get the parts locally. I then need you to send
samples to me so I can compare them with that I am seeing. After I
get some confirmation, I will have everyone send one sample to
Elaine. I will pay for the sample and the testing with SFI.
>
> I really think I have accidently hit on something quite fantastic
here but further experimentation and confirmation from other people
are needed. When I say more bioactivity, I mean I was blown away
with the samples. My brewers are good. They make good tea but this
is an order of magnitude improvement. I had no idea. And the best
part about it is that it is far less expensive than the technology I
was using before. It is about $200 less expensive to build.
>
> To Tom:
>
> A vortex by any other name is a vortex. While my brewers have
lots of air actions and water circultation, this new approach
creates vortices. I am flat blown away.
>
> I will apply for patents Monday and have an ND ready by Wednesday
at the latest. So if anyone is interested, please drop me a line.
>
> Nick and Judy:
>
> You should have received the package but if you haven't, I have
gotten most of it on line so I can just send it that way.
>
> Look folks. I am stoked out of my mind. I never thought that
this would happen like this but before I get too carried away with
my own self-delusion, I need some confirmation. It would be the
happiest accident I could think of. However, the water molecule
stuff just flat failed. Great idea but doesn't work as I am using
it. So I guess NASA was correct in rejecting it.
>
> Ted Peterson
> SOE
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:45:28 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:40 EST